jump to navigation

50 things to do to free up warehouse space August 31, 2007

Posted by Lawrence Loucka in : Lean, Logistics, Supply Chain , add a comment

Business is growing and running out of space in the warehouse.  What to do before moving to a new facility or pouring concrete?  Fifty things to consider:

  1. Cross dock
  2. Narrow aisles
  3. Double deep racks
  4. Bridges over aisles, cross aisles, aisle ends, truck doors
  5. Re-slot forward pick locations
  6. Relocate slow movers and consolidate
  7. Change batteries rather than park and charge
  8. Pushback racks
  9. Pallet flow racks
  10. Carton flow racks
  11. Carousels horizontal or vertical
  12. Use uprights that only go to the top beam, close pack the top deck
  13. Shorter beams; 96" not 108"
  14. Triple wide beams
  15. Vary beam heights
  16. Double stack pallets
  17. Mobile shelving
  18. Purge excess, slow moving, obsolete
  19. Improve put away and pick cycle time and then cut safety stock
  20. Direct or Drop Ship
  21. Drop items from the catalog
  22. Put carton flow racks under pallet racks
  23. Put pick shelves and bins under pallet racks
  24. Slip sheets or low profile pallets
  25. Daily delivery of new pallets and packaging supplies
  26. Check out bound while picking or loading
  27. Check in bound while unloading or put away
  28. Store more than one item per shelf or pallet
  29. Consolidate partial pallets, cartons, bins
  30. Receive and ship on different shifts
  31. Redesign package
  32. Optimize pallet stacking pattern
  33. Select the right pallet
  34. Buy/Make to Order
  35. Buy in smaller lots
  36. Ship in smaller lots
  37. Receive and ship more often
  38. Make inbound receipt appointments
  39. Make delivery appointments
  40. Spot out bound trailers & load directly into trailer
  41. Eliminate inbound inspection
  42. Recalculate safety stock
  43. Recalculate order quantities
  44. Sell slow moving, return for credit, fire sale
  45. Donate, scrap, recycle obsolete
  46. Take assemblies apart and sell spare parts
  47. Combine parts in to kits
  48. Reduce the in and out queues
  49. Control SKU proliferation
  50. Pick directly into the shipping container

PowerPoint and other miscommunications August 5, 2007

Posted by Lawrence Loucka in : Consulting, Lean, Lean Sigma, Sigma , add a comment

Recently read Edward R. Tufte’s The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within and initially dismissed his thesis as troglodyte.  Now sensitized, I’ve been watching for evidence of PowerPoint Abuse.  Found an unfortunate example with two parallel teams during a strategic capital equipment review.  Both teams were given the same mission and access to data: scrutinize the new capital equipment plans, challenge assumptions, collect new data and define cost reduction and risk mitigation plans.  Both teams were staffed with bright industrial, process, manufacturing, quality engineers who pulled on other subject matter experts in their data gathering.  Leadership effectively facilitated and guided both teams through the current state to future state diagnostic journey.  Significant productivity, utilization, overall equipment effectiveness opportunities were identified and tested over the two week full-time exercise.

One team plastered their "war room" with all of their data, continuously rearranging their wall, retelling their story.  The other team began typing their findings and abandoned their wall after a couple of days.  Individual leaders would visit with the teams randomly throughout the study period but never "walked the wall", instead expected PowerPoint slides for the daily out briefs.  Attempts were made to reconcile the two teams leading up to a joint presentation to senior management.

Bottom line - what’s the new equipment price tag to support the new 5 year strategic operating plan?

One team argued for showing both the prior and new estimates as side by side stacked bar charts, the other team just a table listing the $9.6 million delta.

Despite coaching challenges the delta display won out.  Too bad because the Executive VP had remembered "the number" and misinterpreted the table.  Had the first team taken the EVP on a tour of their wall the message would have been clearer.