Sales & Operations Planning

Dick Ling gave a talk on Sales & Operations Planning at Tuesday evening’s meeting of the Atlanta chapter of the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS). Ling has been a manufacturing consultant since 1979 and was once associated with the Oliver Wight Companies. His book on Sales and Operations Planning launched the methodology into corporate America in the mid 80’s. I first met Ling in the early 90’s when S&OP was all about balancing supply and demand. But the world has changed and so too has S&OP. More and more businesses are becoming global and the need for product and service innovation is ever greater. So beyond just tracking widgets and managing demand and supply we are now aware of the need for integrating and rolling out New products and services.

Ling presented 3 Laws. CHANGE – change happens; so manage it PERSPECTIVE – it all depends on where you are coming from; so integrate and align the organization ENTROPY – over time systems (and organizations) become random, break down, morph; so put energy into counter this His 13 Principles for integrated decision making:

  1. The future will be different
  2. Effective planning is all about managing change
  3. Information needs to be prepared and presented for management decision making
  4. Better to be roughly right than precisely wrong
  5. Start with the end in mind
  6. S&OP connects & aligns strategy and tactics
  7. S&OP integrates and reconciles different views
  8. Business planning needs to be multi lingual (units and/or $, process families and/or market segments)
  9. Interdependency is the essence of integrated decision making
  10. Balance the Paradoxes
  11. Have a Framework and balance consistency and bureaucracy
  12. Learn-by-doing and regularly self assess
  13. New tools are important, but making change stick is about PEOPLE

Orchestrating Success: Improve Control of the Business with Sales & Operations Planning Sales & Operations Planning: The How-to Handbook, 2nd Edition

 

 

 

Curse of the Shingo Prize?

Over at LeanBlog, Mark Graban writes about the latest batch of Shingo award recipients in his posts 2006 Shingo Prize Winners, Shingo Winners "Control Their Destiny"?? and Shingo Investing: a Losing Bet where he compares stock performance of past prize winners and finds a nasty negative trend. Bill Waddell of Evolving Excellence wrote Don’t Let Delphi Drag Down the Shingo Prize, lamenting how Delphi can receive so many awards and be patently un-lean. Both authors raise relevant challenges that reminds me of a similar controversy of the "case studies" Tom Peters used in his classic In Search of Excellence.

 

Having worked at and visited a number of the Delphi plants I know they’ve done good things, although in my opinion just too little and too late and at the wrong altitude. With Delphi’s bankruptcy can GM be far behind? What do you think?

 

 

 

 

Fast Innovation

Fast Innovation : Achieving Superior Differentiation, Speed to Market, and Increased ProfitabilityFast Innovation : Achieving Superior Differentiation, Speed to Market, and Increased Profitability by Michael George, James Works, and Kimberly Watson-Hemphill is a great synthesis of current thinking on product and service development. Chapter 2 "How to Become Fast" isn’t about designing faster, rather it’s about how lead time and task variation cause delays in project schedules. Two "Laws" are introduced:

  • Littles’ Law: Time-to-Market is inversely related to the number of projects in-process; the more projects you have, the longer all projects will take. The fewer projects you have, the faster the development process can flow.
  • Law of Innovation Variation: Project task time varies and is related to percent utilization and number of cross trained resources. Delays stack up. Without slack time or off loading of critical resources projects will be late.

 

 

To me, some of the most valuable material is found in Chapter 4, "The Value of Thinking in Three Dimensions":

  • product-service innovation
  • market definition innovation
  • process/business model innovation

I agree with them that although product and service innovation are the cornerstones of most innovation programs (e.g. Microsoft Windows and Voice-over-Internet-Protocol telephony), there are perhaps even greater opportunities in the other two dimensions, market definition innovation (which reflects the leverage possible from existing customer and supplier relationships) and process/business model innovation (which can create a competitive advantage that lasts longer than that from sustaining product or service innovations). The book isn’t a difficult read but will cause you to think, so if you don’t mind exercising your brain you might like picking this one up.

 

 

Driving the Bus

busA colleague of mine, Charlie Hagan, had a unique scale for assessing professional experience and competence. He would describe someone as either having: driven the bus, ridden on the bus, seen the bus drive by, say "what bus?", or be thrown off or under the bus. I was recently reminded of this scale while talking with a self proclaimed organizational development expert who must have been on different buses from the ones I’ve been riding and driving on my lean sigma journey. Organizational transformation, like oil on water, can live comfortably on the surface of an organization resistant to penetrating the fiber and makeup of the culture. Transformation is a major undertaking that comes at a high price. A positive organizational culture reinforces the core beliefs and behaviors that a leader desires while weakening the values and actions the leader rejects. A negative culture becomes toxic, poisoning the life of the organization and hindering any future potential for growth. When dysfunction is detected and cultural change is needed, a major overhaul is called for. Cultures do not readily adjust. A serious mistake made by many leaders is to try to forcefully change the mindsets of those within an organization. Managers often try to force, rather than lead the change. Organizational transformation imposed on followers first is almost always resisted and resented by the followers. Successful leaders first impose change on themselves and then cultivate it in others. As Charlie would say, "Sometimes you got to drive the bus."